商品詳細

Although the 1998 Belfast/Good Friday Agreement brought an end to large-scale violence in Northern Ireland, the durability of peace has remained fragile. Persistent sectarian division, institutional instability, and the shock of Brexit have repeatedly tested the settlement. Yet while political leaders, parties, civil society actors, and international mediators have been extensively studied, one crucial dimension of the peace process has remained largely invisible: the role of the public bureaucracy. Civil Servants and Peacebuilding in Northern Ireland offers the first systematic analysis of how the British, Irish, and Northern Irish civil services helped to design, stabilise, and sustain peace. It argues that peace was not only negotiated politically but also built administratively, through the everyday practices of officials who organised negotiating arenas, drafted texts, cultivated cross-border networks, and maintained continuity during periods of crisis. Drawing on archival research and elite interviews, the book reconstructs the hidden architecture of peacebuilding, foregrounding civil servants as policy entrepreneurs acting under ministerial direction who shaped the conditions under which compromise became possible. Adopting an interdisciplinary framework bridging political science, public administration, and history, the book conceptualises peacebuilding as a pathway towards the institutionalisation of interactive governance. It traces how administrative culture, institutional memory, and informal routines evolved from the height of the conflict through the negotiation, implementation, and testing of the 1998 constitutional settlement. Particular attention is paid to cross-border cooperation, secrecy and backstage diplomacy, and the purposeful use of multivocality and procedural innovation to sustain dialogue in the absence of consensus. This book brings into view a previously under-systematised dimension of the Northern Ireland peace process and extends wider debates on governance and peacebuilding. It shows how bureaucratic infrastructures can underpin political stability even when formal institutions falter, offering insights for other societies grappling with conflict, division, and fragile settlements.