株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Restorative Justice in China : A Paradox of Powerhouse and Resistance.
商品詳細
Restorative Justice in China : A Paradox of Powerhouse and Resistance.
・ISBN 978-3-032-28066-4 hard EUR 129.99
¥34,745.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Zhang, Yan, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia |
| 出版社 | (Palgrave Macmillan, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2026.07 |
| ページ数 | 242 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <776-508 776-634> |
解説
This monograph provides an empirical and theoretical exploration of restorative justice (RJ) in China, the world's largest and most diverse RJ system, yet one that remains underexplored in global socio-legal and criminological scholarship. Based on extensive fieldwork-including semi-structured interviews with legal professionals and community mediators, observations of mediation sessions across urban and Indigenous sites, and archival analysis-the book examines four key RJ programs: people's mediation (community-based dispute resolution), public order mediation (police-led interventions for minor offenses), criminal reconciliation (state-mandated settlements in criminal cases, universally implemented across China), and De Gu mediation (an Indigenous practice among the Yi ethnic minority in Liangshan Prefecture).
Aimed at socio-legal scholars, criminologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and policymakers interested in comparative justice systems, authoritarian governance, legal pluralism, and Indigenous justice, the book reveals how RJ operates within China's party-state regime-often as a "thin but broad" form of justice shaped by political imperatives for social harmony and stability maintenance-while challenging Western-centric RJ models through a multi-layered analysis of macro-ideologies (e.g., Confucian harmony and Maoist dialectics), meso-institutional reforms (e.g., 2010 People's Mediation Law and 2012 Criminal Procedural Law amendments), and micro-practices (e.g., frontline discretion and hybrid state-Indigenous interactions). It highlights RJ's potential for healing, empowerment, and mutual constitution amid domination, thereby contributing to the decolonization of socio-legal theory by integrating Chinese and Indigenous Yi perspectives.