株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Selective Security in the War on Drugs: The Coloniality of State Power in Colombia and Mexico.
商品詳細
Selective Security in the War on Drugs: The Coloniality of State Power in Colombia and Mexico.
・ISBN 978-1-5381-5111-2 paper GB£ 28.99
¥9,183.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Jenss, Alke, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | (Transforming Capitalism) |
| 出版社 | (Bloomsbury Academic, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2026 |
| ページ数 | 298 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <A05-82668> |
解説
Paramilitaries, crime, and tens of thousands of disappeared persons-the so-called war on drugs has perpetuated violence in Latin America, at times precisely in regions of economic growth. Legal and illegal economy are difficult to distinguish. A failure of state institutions to provide security for its citizens does not sufficiently explain this.
Selective Security in the War on Drugs analyzes authoritarian neoliberalism in the war on drugs in Colombia and Mexico. It interprets the "security projects" of the 2000s-when the security provided by the state became ever more selective-as embedded in processes of land appropriation, transformed property relations, and global capital accumulation. By zooming in on security practices in Colombia and Mexico in that decade and juxtaposing the two contexts, this book offers a detailed analysis of the role of the state in violence. To what extent and for whom do states produce order and disorder? Which social forces support and drive such state practices?
Expanding the literature on authoritarian neoliberalism and the coloniality of state power-thus linking political economy to postcolonial approaches-the book builds a theoretical lens to study state security practices. Different social groups, enjoying differentiated access to the state, influenced the state discourse on crime to very different extents. Security practices-which oscillated between dispersed organization by a multiplicity of actors and institutionalization with the military-materialized as horrific insecurity for social groups thought of as disposable. In tendency, putting security centerstage disabled dissent. The "security projects" exacerbated contradictions driven by a particular economic model and simultaneously criminalized precisely those that this model had already radically disadvantaged.