商品詳細

Most studies approaching biblical studies with disability studies primarily utilize synchronic approaches to the biblical text. While historical concerns have not been ignored, historical critical approaches have not been brought into dialogue with disability studies. Grant F. Gates reads the Deuteronomistic Collection with insight from disability studies diachronically to engage redaction critical questions. He argues that different conceptions of disability emerged in Judah than in the northern kingdom of Israel in the ninth through sixth centuries BCE. The author draws on the critical theory of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, particularly their concept of faciality. Later developments on Deleuzoguattarian theory have developed non-representational theory; the author proposes a non-representational approach to disability primarily built on faciality. Using this methodology, different facialities for similar impairments distinguish northern from southern conceptions of disability in the Deuteronomistic Collection.
Using faciality to explore visual impairments, skin disease, and mobility impairments in the Deuteronomistic Collection, the author argues that the north exhibits less developed, less identitarian, more fluid conceptions of disability, and the south more developed, more representational, more territorialized conceptions of disability. Recognizing these distinctions provides a means for engaging redactional questions, particularly in texts with complicated histories involving both kingdoms, such as the David story. Pressing against representations of disability with a non-representational approach reveals the inherent instability of disability categories. As this breakdown underscores the representational nature of disability as faciality, the study critiques representation more broadly, allowing a deterritorialization of disability in the Deuteronomistic Collection.