株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Research-Driven Building Envelope Design: A Systematic and Methodological Review on Future-oriented Innovations and Complexities.
商品詳細
Research-Driven Building Envelope Design: A Systematic and Methodological Review on Future-oriented Innovations and Complexities.
・ISBN 978-3-032-31634-9 paper EUR 49.99
¥13,361.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Paoletti, Ingrid / Nastri, Massimiliano, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | (SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology) |
| 出版社 | (Springer Nature Switzerland AG, SZ) |
| 出版年月 | 2026 |
| ページ数 | 108 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <A05-78484> |
解説
This book provides a systematic and methodological review of research-driven building envelope design, establishing a scientifically validated framework for analyzing innovations and complexities in advanced facade systems. It addresses the growing fragmentation of knowledge in advanced facade design by offering a transparent, reproducible, and PRISMA-based analytical apparatus capable of organizing heterogeneous research contributions into a coherent scientific structure. It systematically examines innovations and complexities through two interconnected domains: "innovative and complex design" methodologies, and "innovative and complex environmental and energy design" approaches. Within this framework, building envelopes are interpreted as multi-functional, adaptive, and computable systems, rather than static architectural components. Topics include computational and parametric design methodologies, simulation and performance-driven procedures, optimization and algorithmic decision-making frameworks, multi-criteria decision-making methods, BIM-integrated workflows, digital twins, and Artificial Intelligence-driven systems. These topics are not treated as isolated technologies but as interdependent methodological constructs whose relationships, assumptions, and limitations are critically assessed through structured comparison. The book also addresses a critical gap in existing literature by formalizing design knowledge through hierarchical organization of procedures and tools, supported by comparative diagrams and synoptic frameworks. Selected projects and experimental applications are used not as illustrative case studies but as verification layers to assess methodological robustness and operational feasibility.