株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Banning Queer Blood: Rhetorics of Citizenship, Contagion, and Resistance.
商品詳細
Banning Queer Blood: Rhetorics of Citizenship, Contagion, and Resistance.
・ISBN 978-0-8173-5851-8 paper US$ 29.95
￥7,016.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Bennett, Jeffrey A., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | (Rhetoric, Culture, and, Social Critique) |
| 出版社 | (The University of Alabama Press, US) |
| 出版年月 | 2015 |
| ページ数 | 208 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜A05-75529＞ |
解説
In Banning Queer Blood, Jeffrey Bennett frames blood donation as a performance of civic identity closely linked to the meaning of citizenship. However, with the advent of AIDS came the notion of blood donation as a potentially dangerous process. Bennett argues that the Food and Drug Administration, by employing images that specifically depict gay men as contagious, has categorized gay men as a menace to the nation. The FDA's ban on blood donation by gay men remains in effect and serves to propagate the social misconceptions about gay men that circulate within both the straight and gay communities today.
Bennett explores the role of scientific research cited by these banned-blood policies and its disquieting relationship to government agencies, including the FDA. Bennett draws parallels between the FDA's position on homosexuality and the historical precedents of discrimination by government agencies against racial minorities. The author concludes by describing the resistance posed by queer donors, who either lie in order to donate blood or protest discrimination at donation sites, and by calling for these prejudiced policies to be abolished.
Bennett explores the role of scientific research cited by these banned-blood policies and its disquieting relationship to government agencies, including the FDA. Bennett draws parallels between the FDA's position on homosexuality and the historical precedents of discrimination by government agencies against racial minorities. The author concludes by describing the resistance posed by queer donors, who either lie in order to donate blood or protest discrimination at donation sites, and by calling for these prejudiced policies to be abolished.