株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Between Freedom and Hierarchy : Max Weber's Social Politics.

商品詳細

Between Freedom and Hierarchy

Between Freedom and Hierarchy : Max Weber's Social Politics. 自由と階級の間-M.ヴェーバーの社会政治

・ISBN 978-0-19-890715-2 hard GB£ 40.00

¥12,672.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍のご注文が完了した時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-890718-3

著者・編者Ghosh, Peter,
出版社(Oxford U. Pr., UK)
出版年月2026.06
ページ数480 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<758-537 758-861>

解説

In his later life, Max Weber's work focused on ideas about rule and hierarchy encapsulated in the German word Herrschaft. These ideas are unique in the canon of Western political theory in that they derive almost exclusively from social categories (agency, power, hierarchy), rather than more conventional political ones (constitutions, democracy). This produces a picture of 'political' life which is self-evident to us today, yet it is theoretically novel. Weber was passionately committed to the idea of human agency: that all people contained within them the potential for ordering their lives in ways they found meaningful. But he also accepted the presence of powerful external constraints on agency, created by the exercise of agency itself--the unequal outcomes of free competition--or impersonal forces, such as technology and bureaucracy. So free societies and polities revolve around two opposite poles: freedom and hierarchy. Weber developed these ideas in parallel with what he now began to call his 'sociology'. The foundations of his thought go back to 1904-5, but engagement with political theory made him reflect more carefully on what one could say about social life in general, and how much this differed from conditions specific to politics or any other life-sphere. He evolved an original, 'federal' model of sociology: a small general core set alongside much larger special sociologies on (for example) politics, religion, law, the economy. This is unique amongst the classical sociologists. In this way, the book covers the major novelties of Weber's final decade and presents the first comprehensive historical portrait of Weber's political ideas. Weber has an immense variety of modern readers and users, but the perspective of the historian with no other commitment than to what he himself thought, is the nearest that we can come to a detached or neutral view of him.