株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > How Does Architecture Distribute the Sensible? : Engaging Jacques Ranciere.
商品詳細
How Does Architecture Distribute the Sensible? : Engaging Jacques Ranciere.
・ISBN 978-1-350-34280-4 hard GB£ 85.00
¥26,928.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-350-34283-5
| 著者・編者 | Bedford, Joseph (ed.), |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Architecture Exchange: Engagements with Contemporary Theory and Philosophy |
| 出版社 | (Bloomsbury Academic, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2025.12 |
| ページ数 | 208 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <757-75> |
解説
Jacques Ranciere is one of the leading thinkers not only of contemporary aesthetic theory but contemporary philosophy in general. After his break from Althusser, Ranciere developed the radical and axiomatic principal of the absolute equality of intelligences and capacities that defined his entire body of work, from his critique of philosophy, to his historical studies of emancipated modes of labor and education, to the articulation of dissensus from the order of the police. Ranciere's trajectory as a philosopher led him towards aesthetics where offered a radical reinterpretation of the political meaning of aesthetics and with it, of modernism and postmodernism that, having shaken the world of art, is now shaking the world of architecture.
This book brings Jacques Ranciere's demand for equality and his reformulation of aesthetics into direct dialogue with architecture. In doing so, it inquires into the role that architecture plays in distributing the sensible, in creating aesthetic experiences, in creating order or dissensus, in serving as a mode of critique, and in emancipating or stultifying its users and subjects.
Through this detailed exchange between Ranciere and four of the world's leading architectural thinkers; Anthony Vidler, Joan Ockman, Peggy Deamer and Michael Young, a debate unfolds within the book that tests the implications of Ranciere's aesthetic philosophy for architectural practice today; questioning the way we write architectural history, how architects draw, what the labor of the architect is, and that questions key architectural ideas such as the distribution, function, use, ornament, discipline and design.