株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Seeing the Self: Heidegger on Subjectivity. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1998

商品詳細

Seeing the Self: Heidegger on Subjectivity. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1998

Seeing the Self: Heidegger on Subjectivity. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1998

・ISBN 978-1-4020-0259-5 paper EUR 109.99

¥29,399.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Overenget, Einar,
シリーズ (Phaenomenologica)
出版社 (Springer-Verlag New York Inc., US)
出版年月2001
ページ数348 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<A04-80764>

解説

" . . . die Augen hat mir Husserl eingesetzt. ,,1 he aim of Twentieth century phenomenology is to provide a non- T psychologistic interpretation of subjectivity. Husserl agrees with Frege; to adopt psychologism is to give up truth. But this should not prevent us from investigating the subjective perspective. On the contrary, Husserl thinks that an appropriate rejection of psychologism must be able to show how propositions are correlated to and grounded in subjective intuitions without thereby reducing them to psychological phenomena. Obviously this calls for an interpretation of subjectivity that makes a sharp distinction between the subjective perspective and the psychological realm. Phenomenology is devoted to the development of a notion of subjectivity that is in accordance with our experience of the world. A fundamental tenet of phenomenology is that philosophy should not dispute this experience but rather account for it. Hence, phenomenology must avoid a notion of subjectivity in which it becomes a problem to account for how a subject can ever hook up with the world. In other words, a phenomenological interpretation of subjectivity must radically disassociate itself from what is often referred to as a worldless, Cartesian subject, a res cogitans. But neither can an interpretation of SUbjectivity consistently advocate a position according to which the human order is described only in the categories appropriate to the physical order. Such an interpretation is obviously not compatible with the phenomenal basis for undertaking this very interpretation, that is, our experience of the world.