株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Re-Reading Pareto on Elite Power and Societal Bipolarisation : A Critical Perspective on Metapolitics and Democracy.
商品詳細
Re-Reading Pareto on Elite Power and Societal Bipolarisation : A Critical Perspective on Metapolitics and Democracy. パレートのエリートの権力及び社会の二極化論を再読する
・ISBN 978-1-041-06446-6 hard GB£ 171.99
¥54,486.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-003-63719-6
| 著者・編者 | Marshall, Alasdair J., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Routledge Studies in Social and Political Thought |
| 出版社 | (Routledge, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2025.08 |
| ページ数 | 276 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <748-540 748-837> |
解説
Assessing Vilfredo Pareto's sociological reworkings of Machiavelli's Fox and Lion animal spirits as friend-enemy codings, this book offers a unique insight into the growing division today between relatively liberal elites and relatively conservative non-elites.
Re-Reading Pareto on Elite Power and Societal Bipolarisation utilises key ideas common to Pareto's elite theory, general sociology and theory of demagogic plutocracy, and fleshes out a unique perspective for making sense of contemporary societal bipolarisation in terms of friend-enemy codings. The first part of the book explores what Pareto's core ideas are and outlines why they matter today. The second part considers how we might elaborate and apply Pareto's concept of 'open elites' to reverse contemporary societal bipolarisation and build safer and more mature democracies. The third part explains how we can apply Pareto to predict further deterioration towards fundamental social conflict - such that Pareto's sociological imagination becomes risk imagination we desperately need today.
For academics and students across the domains of sociology, political science and social science in general, the book warns of widespread elite-institutional bias in their research and points to Pareto's neutral and balanced approach as a corrective - offering a uniquely Paretian view of minimal criteria for democracy, as well as a uniquely balanced analytical perspective for making sense of our 'culture war'.