株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Tradition, Interpretation, and Science: Political Theory in the American Academy.
商品詳細
Tradition, Interpretation, and Science: Political Theory in the American Academy.
・ISBN 978-0-88706-373-2 paper US$ 38.95
¥9,125.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Nelson, John S. (ed.), |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | (SUNY series in Political Theory: Contemporary Issues) |
| 出版社 | (State University of New York Press, US) |
| 出版年月 | 1986 |
| ページ数 | 372 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <A04-26691> |
解説
This book reassesses the academic field of political theory and brings into sharp relief its problems and opportunities. Here for the first time, diverse theorists coordinate their arguments through a common focus. This focus is the writing of John G. Gunnell.
Gunnell attacks a set of myths said to plague almost every recent theory about politics: the myth of the given, the myth of science, myths of theory, the myth of tradition, and the myth of the political. He argues that these all alienate political theory from substantive inquiry and actual practice.
Contributors include Richard E. Flathman, Russell L. Hanson, George Kateb, Paul F. Kress, J. Donald Moon, John S. Nelson, J.G.A. Pocock, Herbert G. Reid, Ira L. Strauber, Nathan Tarcov, and Sheldon S. Wolin. They respond on behalf of projects in the new history of political theory, epic theory, phenomenology, traditional theory, and political deconstruction. These discussions also address the theories of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Juergen Habermas, Karl Marx, Leo Strauss, Alain Touraine, and Ludwig Wittgenstein.
At the conclusion of the volume, Gunnell reconsiders his arguments in light of the respondent's remarks. His challenges thus provide a series of confrontations - both exciting and provocative - among major theorists. The result is a lively debate about what political theory is, how it relates to political history and practice, and how it involves epistemology. The authors probe a broad range of questions about practices of politics and traditions of discourse, and they identify priorities for the future of the field.