株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > The Making and Unmaking of Colonial Cities : Urban Planning, Imperial Power, and the Improvisational Itineraries of the Poor.
商品詳細
The Making and Unmaking of Colonial Cities : Urban Planning, Imperial Power, and the Improvisational Itineraries of the Poor.
・ISBN 978-0-19-888124-7 hard GB£ 73.00
¥23,126.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-199076-2
| 著者・編者 | Obert, Julia C., |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Oxford University Press, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2023 |
| ページ数 | 218 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <L25-32940> |
解説
The Making and Unmaking of Colonial Cities is a comparative study of architectural space in four (post-)colonial capitals: Belfast, Northern Ireland; Windhoek, Namibia; Bridgetown, Barbados; and Hanoi, Vietnam. Each chapter takes up one of these cities, outlining its history of building and urban planning under colonial rule and linking that history to its contemporary shape and scope. This genealogical information is drawn from primary source documents and archival materials. The chapters then look to local literary texts to better understand the lingering impact of colonial building practices on individuals living in (post-)colonial cities today. These texts often foreground the difficulty of moving through a city that can never feel comfortably one's own; legacies of racial segregation, buildings that disregard indigenous resources, and street names that serve as constant reminders of a history of oppression, for example, can produce feelings of anxiety, even of unbelonging, for native subjects. However, the literature also highlights ways in which the subversive wanderings of particular pedestrians-taking shortcuts, trespassing in forbidden places, diverting spaces from their intended uses-can contest 'official' topography. Bodies can therefore move against the power of a repressive regime, at least to some degree, even when that power is literally set in stone. Obert argues for the significance of these small gestures of reclamation, suggesting that we must counterpose the potential flexibility of lived space to the prohibitions of the map in order to more fully understand (post-)colonial power relations.