株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Advanced Calculus : A Geometric View. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2010.
商品詳細
Advanced Calculus : A Geometric View. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2010.
・ISBN 978-1-4939-4070-7 paper EUR 69.99
¥18,707.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Callahan, James J., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics |
| 出版社 | (Springer-Verlag New York Inc., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2016 |
| ページ数 | 526 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <M25-4757> |
解説
A half-century ago, advanced calculus was a well-de?ned subject at the core of the undergraduate mathematics curriulum. The classic texts of Taylor [19], Buck [1], Widder [21], and Kaplan [9], for example, show some of the ways it was approached. Over time, certain aspects of the course came to be seen as more signi?cant-those seen as giving a rigorous foundation to calculus-and they - came the basis for a new course, an introduction to real analysis, that eventually supplanted advanced calculus in the core. Advanced calculus did not, in the process, become less important, but its role in the curriculum changed. In fact, a bifurcation occurred. In one direction we got c- culus on n-manifolds, a course beyond the practical reach of many undergraduates; in the other, we got calculus in two and three dimensions but still with the theorems of Stokes and Gauss as the goal. The latter course is intended for everyone who has had a year-long introduction to calculus; it often has a name like Calculus III. In my experience, though, it does not manage to accomplish what the old advancedcalculus course did. Multivariable calculusnaturallysplits intothreeparts:(1)severalfunctionsofonevariable,(2)one function of several variables, and (3) several functions of several variables. The ?rst two are well-developed in Calculus III, but the third is really too large and varied to be treated satisfactorily in the time remaining at the end of a semester. To put it another way: Green's theorem ?ts comfortably; Stokes' and Gauss' do not.