株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Visionary Dreariness : Readings in Romanticism's Quotidian Sublime.

商品詳細

Visionary Dreariness

Visionary Dreariness : Readings in Romanticism's Quotidian Sublime.

・ISBN 978-0-415-97896-5 hard GB£ 103.99

¥32,943.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-203-96050-9

著者・編者Poetzsch, Markus,
シリーズLiterary Criticism and Cultural Theory
出版社(Routledge, UK)
出版年月2006
ページ数238 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<L25-25176 L25-9452>

解説

Visionary Dreariness: Readings in Romanticism's Quotidian Sublime undertakes a reconceptualization of the theoretical and experiential framework of the Romantic sublime by shifting the focus from Burke's and Kant's prescriptions of natural vastness and grandeur to the narrower but no less wondrous spaces, objects and experiences of everyday life.

This shift is defined as a descent from mountaintops to an encounter, in William Blake's terms, with 'a World in a Grain of Sand.' The purpose of this book is to sift the literature of the Romantic everyday, both prose and poetry, canonical and noncanonical, for such grains. In order to define the inherently amorphous and subsumptive sphere called 'everyday life,' the author draws upon two main theoretical threads: the first, based on the phenomenological poetics of Gaston Bachelard, serves to elucidate the depth and diversity of everyday household space; the second, comprising the work of Henri Lefebvre and Michel de Certeau, defines the generative potential, what de Certeau glosses as the 'everyday creativity,' of some of the most basic human activities such as walking, reading and washing, to name but a few. The role of the everyday in Romantic literature has in recent years received greater scholarly attention, particularly from critics dissatisfied with the perpetuation of what Karina Williamson characterizes as a 'debased Romanticism which rules there is a category of experience and expression which is poetic and all the rest is ordinary and inadmissible.' The present study serves to map the intersections of these categories of experience and expression-the sublime and the quotidian-and thereby to challenge our assumptions about the aesthetic value of the everyday not only in the Romantic period but also in our own.