株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Galileo and the Almagest, c.1589-1592 : How Ptolemaic Astronomy Influenced Galileo's Early Writings on Motion.

商品詳細

Galileo and the Almagest, c.1589-1592

Galileo and the Almagest, c.1589-1592 : How Ptolemaic Astronomy Influenced Galileo's Early Writings on Motion. ガリレオと『アルマゲスト』 1589~92年

・ISBN 978-3-031-70613-4 hard EUR 44.99

¥12,025.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Malara, Ivan,
シリーズPalgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology
出版社(Palgrave Macmillan, UK)
出版年月2024.12
ページ数151 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<736-126>

解説

This book offers a groundbreaking exploration of Galileo Galilei's engagement with the Almagest, Claudius Ptolemy's second-century scientific work on the motions of stars and planetary paths. Contrary to the belief that Galileo had little interest in Ptolemaic astronomy, the author investigates whether Ptolemy influenced Galileo's shift to Copernicanism, the theory that Earth and all other planets revolve around the Sun. This inquiry is pursued through a detailed examination of Galileo's early writings on motion, namely the so-called De motu antiquiora (c. 1589-1592). By contextualizing Galileo's initial reception of Ptolemy, the book reveals a fascinating historical backdrop, highlighting how the Almagest was intended to be read and studied in Galileo's milieu during the last decades of the sixteenth century. The author challenges the conventional 'Ptolemaic-Aristotelian' label by showing that early Galileo adhered to a Ptolemaic, yet non-Aristotelian, cosmology supported by an Archimedean-like rationale. Additionally, the book underscores the often-overlooked impact of Theon of Alexandria's commentary on the Almagest in the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century reception of Ptolemy, suggesting it as one of Galileo's potential sources. Offering valuable insights for historians of science and early modern astronomy, this book illuminates Galileo's intricate relationship with astronomical and philosophical ideas, emphasizing the need to re-examine his intellectual journey within a nuanced historical framework.