株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Limits of Freedom of Public Authorities with Respect to Obtaining Evidence at the Stage of Investigation : A Comparative Legal Study.
商品詳細
Limits of Freedom of Public Authorities with Respect to Obtaining Evidence at the Stage of Investigation : A Comparative Legal Study.
・ISBN 978-90-04-71031-3 hard EUR 159.00
￥42,500.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック（eBook）ISBN 978-90-04-71032-0
| 著者・編者 | Rogacka-Rzewnicka, Maria (ed.), |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Ius Comparatum |
| 出版社 | (Brill / Nijhoff, NE) |
| 出版年月 | 2024.11 |
| ページ数 | 280 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜730-467＞ |
解説
Any democratic legal system recognizes that the pursuit of the truth about a crime must have impassable limits, and that in contemporary legal systems the public authorities' principle of freedom to obtain evidence in criminal proceedings is not absolute. Drawing these boundaries is a permanent process, which produces universal legal problems of fundamental practical importance.
This book addresses the fundamental importance of the protection of the individual from potential actions of state bodies that violate legally marked boundaries. Contributors synthesize knowledge about the admissibility of evidence in criminal procedure, evidence that must not be used or should not be used under certain circumstances, and the conditions for the admissibility of unlawfully obtained evidence. This comparative analysis of national evidentiary procedures is an essential showcase of certain legislative patterns and similarities between individual legal systems.
This book addresses the fundamental importance of the protection of the individual from potential actions of state bodies that violate legally marked boundaries. Contributors synthesize knowledge about the admissibility of evidence in criminal procedure, evidence that must not be used or should not be used under certain circumstances, and the conditions for the admissibility of unlawfully obtained evidence. This comparative analysis of national evidentiary procedures is an essential showcase of certain legislative patterns and similarities between individual legal systems.