株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Mirrors for Princes : How "Tips for Tyrants" Became Cliches of Leadership.
商品詳細
Mirrors for Princes : How "Tips for Tyrants" Became Cliches of Leadership.
・ISBN 978-1-64712-453-3 hard US$ 89.95
¥21,074.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
・ISBN 978-1-64712-553-0 paper US$ 29.95
¥7,016.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Keeley, Michael, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Georgetown U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2024.09 |
| ページ数 | 408 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <729-1177 729-419> |
解説
A historical look at the roots of management theory reveals its flaws and offers important lessons for today's leaders For four thousand years, kings and queens ruled the known world, while management experts-in the guises of sages, clerics, and courtiers of all kinds-told them how to do it. These proto-experts in leadership, ethics, and strategy wrote books describing the perfect prince. In such books, rulers could seek and polish their own reflection, as in a looking glass. These books were called mirrors for princes. Mirrors for Princes documents the cliches of this genre of literature. Typical mirrors taught the same formula, over and over: that people behave badly because of their pursuit of self-interest, which needs to be harnessed to a common goal by the ruler or leader. Eighteenth-century revolutions spelled the demise of princes and led to books that sought instruct them. Today, the cliches of mirrors for princes live on in modern mirrors for managers. The rhetoric of common goals and transformational leadership has a pleasing resonance for top managers, affirming their authority, just as it did for kings and queens in mirrors for princes. Keeley's goal is to sensitize readers to these cliches and to provide today's business leaders with the tools to think more critically when reading business books. Mirrors for Princes concludes with advice for writers of management literature, suggesting how organizational theorists and business ethicists might avoid replicating the cliches of mirrors for princes by adopting a social-contract model of organizations.