株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Holding the Political Center in Illinois : Conservatism and Union on the Brink of the Civil War.

商品詳細

Holding the Political Center in Illinois

Holding the Political Center in Illinois : Conservatism and Union on the Brink of the Civil War.

・ISBN 978-1-60635-479-7 paper US$ 39.95

¥12,216.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Iverson, Ian T.,
シリーズInterpreting the Civil War: Text and Contexts
出版社(Kent State U. Pr., US)
出版年月2024.10
ページ数288 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<729-1748>

解説

The importance of political moderation in preserving the Union

Holding the Political Center in Illinois charts the political trajectory of Illinois from the introduction of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 through the firing on Fort Sumter in 1861. Throughout, Iverson focuses on the significance of political moderation in this era of partisan extremes, one in which the very label of "conservative" was contested. Most often framed through the biography of Abraham Lincoln, the turbulence of antebellum-era and political realignment in Illinois has been widely misunderstood, yet the Prairie State's geographic, economic, and demographic diversity makes it an especially fascinating microcosm through which to examine the politics of self-identified conservatives leading up to the Civil War.

Most politicians and voters in this period claimed to be conservative and stood opposed to radical secessionists and abolitionists. By positioning "conservatism" as a disposition rather than an ideology, Ian. T. Iverson explores how mainstream politicians in the Democratic, Republican, and Know-Nothing Parties employed a shared interpretation of American liberty, history, and institutions to court voters throughout the sectional crisis. Ultimately, this united reaction against secession, which propelled Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas to rally together behind the Union's banner in April 1861, rose from an unconditional centrist commitment to the Union-the core value defining conservatism.