株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Welfare Economics and Second-Best Theory: A Distortion-Analysis Protocol for Economic-Efficiency Prediction. 2020 ed.

商品詳細

Welfare Economics and Second-Best Theory: A Distortion-Analysis Protocol for Economic-Efficiency Prediction. 2020 ed.

Welfare Economics and Second-Best Theory: A Distortion-Analysis Protocol for Economic-Efficiency Prediction. 2020 ed.

・ISBN 978-3-030-43362-8 paper EUR 49.99

¥13,361.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Markovits, Richard S.,
出版社 (Springer Nature Switzerland AG, SZ)
出版年月2021
ページ数356 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<A02-90303>

解説

This book examines the implications of The General Theory of Second Best for analyzing the economic efficiency of non-government conduct or government policies in an economically efficient way. It develops and legitimates an economically efficient economic-efficiency-analysis protocol with three unique characteristics: First, the protocol focuses separately on each of a wide variety of categories of economic inefficiency, many of which conventional analyses ignore. Second, it analyzes the impact of conduct or policies on each of these categories of economic inefficiency, primarily by predicting the respective conduct's/policy's impact on the distortion that the economy's various Pareto imperfections generate in the profits yielded by the resource allocations associated with the individual categories of economic inefficiency-i.e., on the difference between their profitability and economic efficiency. And third, it is third-best-i.e., it instructs the analyst toexecute a theoretical or empirical research project if and only if the economic-efficiency gains the project is expected to generate by increasing the accuracy of economic-efficiency conclusions exceed the predicted allocative cost of its execution and public financing. The book also uses the protocol to analyze the economic efficiency of specific policies so as to illustrate both how it differs from the protocols that most applied welfare economists continue to use and how its conclusions differ from those produced by standard analysis.