株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Overlapping Individual and Interstate Claims in International Law.
商品詳細
Overlapping Individual and Interstate Claims in International Law. 国際法における個人と国家間の主張の重複
・ISBN 978-0-19-287146-6 hard GB£ 115.00
¥36,432.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-196770-2
| 著者・編者 | Howley, Jessica, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Oxford Monographs in International Law |
| 出版社 | (Oxford U. Pr., UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2024.07 |
| ページ数 | 384 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <720-527> |
解説
Mechanisms for individuals to bring claims under international law have become increasingly common in recent decades, particularly in human rights and investment law. Nonetheless, when the International Law Commission codified the law of State responsibility, it largely ignored the bringing of international claims by individuals, and the relationship between such claims and those brought on the interstate level. Overlapping Individual and Interstate Claims in International Law is the first dedicated monograph examining this relationship - one that is of mounting importance on both a practical and theoretical level. This work provides a comprehensive survey of the potential for overlapping individual and interstate claims to arise. It underlines issues of fairness, consistency, and interference with autonomy that can result when multiple claimants vie to have their claims determined before different forums. The author analyses in detail how treaty provisions and various rules and principles of international law can be expected to regulate such overlapping claims, considering, among others, the local remedies rule, the rule precluding double recovery, res judicata, waiver, and certain circumstances precluding wrongfulness. The book clarifies the nature of international claims, including in the theoretically muddled field of diplomatic protection, and highlights undertheorized foundations of topical debates concerning the use of countermeasures and self-defence outside of the interstate arena. It concludes with a human rights-oriented proposal for resolving the complex policy issues to which these overlapping claims give rise.