株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Philoponus': On Aristotle On the Soul 3.9-13 with Stephanus: On Aristotle On Interpretation.

商品詳細

Philoponus': On Aristotle On the Soul 3.9-13 with Stephanus: On Aristotle On Interpretation.

Philoponus': On Aristotle On the Soul 3.9-13 with Stephanus: On Aristotle On Interpretation.

・ISBN 978-1-4725-5850-3 paper GB£ 38.99

¥12,351.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-4725-5149-8
著者・編者Charlton, W.,
シリーズ (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle)
出版社 (Bloomsbury Academic, UK)
出版年月2014
ページ数240 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<A02-31552>

解説

The earlier part of the commentary by 'Philoponus' on Aristotle's On the Soul is translated by William Charlton in another volume in the series. This volume includes the latter part of the commentary along with a translation of Stephanus' commentary on Aristotle 's On Interpretation. It thus enables readers to assess for themselves Charlton's view that the commentary once ascribed to Philoponus should in fact be ascribed to Stephanus.
The two treatises of Aristotle here commented on are very different from each other. In On Interpretation Aristotle studies the logic of opposed pairs of statements. It is in this context that Aristotle discusses the nature of language and the implications for determinism of opposed predictions about a future occurrence, such as a sea-battle. And Stephanus, like his predecessor Ammonius, brings in other deterministic arguments not considered by Aristotle ('The Reaper' and the argument from God's foreknowledge). In On the Soul 3.9-13, Aristotle introduces a theory of action and motivation and sums up the role of perception in animal life.
Despite the differences in subject matter between the two texts, Charlton is able to make a good case for Stephanus' authorship of both commentaries. He also sees Stephanus as preserving what was valuable from Ammonius' earlier commentary On Interpretation, while bringing to bear the virtue of greater concision. At the same time, Stephanus reveals his Christian affiliations, in contrast to Ammonius, his pagan predecessor.