株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧The Constitutional Structure of Europe's Area of 'Freedom, Security and Justice' and the Right to Justification.

商品詳細

The Constitutional Structure of Europe's Area of 'Freedom, Security and Justice' and the Right to Justification.

The Constitutional Structure of Europe's Area of 'Freedom, Security and Justice' and the Right to Justification.

・ISBN 978-1-5099-4573-3 paper GB£ 41.99

¥13,302.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-5099-1252-0
著者・編者Herlin-Karnell, Ester,
シリーズ (Hart Studies in Security and Justice)
出版社 (Hart Publishing, UK)
出版年月2020
ページ数200 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<A02-31162>

解説

This book explores the implications of freedom as a non-domination-oriented view for understanding EU security regulation and its constitutional implications. At a time when the European borders are under pressure and with the refugee and migration crisis, which escalated in 2015, the idea of exploring a constitutional theory for the 'Area of Freedom, Security and Justice' (AFSJ) might seem to be a utopian project. This appears especially true in the light of the increased threat of terrorism in Europe (and on a global scale) and where the expanding EU security agenda is often advanced through the administrative law path, in contrast to the constitutional trajectory. Add to this the prolonged financial crisis, which continues to cast a long shadow on the future development of EU integration, and which suggests that Europe needs to 're-invent itself' beyond the sphere of economics. Therefore, it is precisely because of the current uncertainties regarding the progress of the EU and the constitutional law project that a constitutional take on the AFSJ is of particular importance. The book investigates the meaning of non-domination and the idea of justice and justification in the area of EU security regulation. In doing so, it focuses on the development of an AFSJ, what it means, and why it represents a fascinating example of contemporary constitutional law with interacting layers of security regulation, human rights law and transnational legal theory at its core.