株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Pushback : The Political Fallout of Unpopular Supreme Court Decisions.
商品詳細
Pushback : The Political Fallout of Unpopular Supreme Court Decisions.
・ISBN 978-0-8262-2303-6 hard US$ 45.00
￥10,543.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Bridge, Dave, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Studies in Constitutional Democracy |
| 出版社 | (U. Missouri Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2024.03 |
| ページ数 | 388 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜716-1163 716-580＞ |
解説
The Supreme Court has usually operated in majoritarian fashion but not always, and when it hasn't done so, the consequences of its decisions have had an extremely important impact on the Court, political parties, party formation, and politics in general.
In writing Pushback, an interdisciplinary book in an interdisciplinary series, Dave Bridge crosses methodological boundaries. Sometimes, the inquiry allows for procedural data collection with measurable observations (e.g., polls, number of congressional proposals, roll call tallies, breakdown of factional affiliations). At other times, he relies on historical narrative to describe complex stories that can only be told by attending to sequence, actors, institutions, and norms. The end result offers readers an innovative and highly accessible ways to think about the ways in which our constitutional democracy can push back against rare counter-majoritarian Supreme Court decisions.
In writing Pushback, an interdisciplinary book in an interdisciplinary series, Dave Bridge crosses methodological boundaries. Sometimes, the inquiry allows for procedural data collection with measurable observations (e.g., polls, number of congressional proposals, roll call tallies, breakdown of factional affiliations). At other times, he relies on historical narrative to describe complex stories that can only be told by attending to sequence, actors, institutions, and norms. The end result offers readers an innovative and highly accessible ways to think about the ways in which our constitutional democracy can push back against rare counter-majoritarian Supreme Court decisions.