株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Genetic Seeds of Warfare: Evolution, Nationalism, and Patriotism.

商品詳細

Genetic Seeds of Warfare: Evolution, Nationalism, and Patriotism.

Genetic Seeds of Warfare: Evolution, Nationalism, and Patriotism.

・ISBN 978-0-367-61544-4 paper GB£ 33.99

¥10,767.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 9781003105459
著者・編者Shaw, R. Paul / Wong, Yuwa,
シリーズ (Routledge Library Editions: Security and Society)
出版社 (Routledge, UK)
出版年月2022
ページ数288 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<A02-9382>

解説

For millennia humanity has simultaneously deplored and waged war. With each conflict the stakes have risen, and we now face global annihilation for the sake of a practice all the world claims to condemn. Is there some seemingly irresistible force that impels us toward our own destruction?

To explain this central paradox of human behaviour, Genetic Seeds of Warfare, originally published in 1989, advances a startling new theory. It traces the origins of warfare back to early groups of Homo sapiens in competition for scarce resources, showing that warfare evolved as these groups evolved: kin-group against kin-group; tribe against tribe; nation against nation. Rather than being tied to a specific gene, warfare emerged as one of many behavioural strategies for maximising genetic survival. As social groups became more complex, motivations for warfare developed from simple protection of blood relations to political appeals to shared ethnicity, religion, and national identity. But the ultimate cause of warfare is rooted in the most basic of human drives: the need to ensure that one's genes will survive and reproduce.

The authors challenge many assumptions about human behaviour in general, and warfare in particular. They convincingly present the case for an evolutionary understanding of the propensity for warfare, supporting their argument with data from a vast array of social and natural science research. In doing so, they reveal why previous attempts at ending war have failed, and make proactive suggestions toward the development of a new agenda for world peace.