株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧The Changing Voice of the Anti-Abortion Movement : The Rise of "Pro-Woman" Rhetoric in Canada and the United States.

商品詳細

The Changing Voice of the Anti-Abortion Movement

The Changing Voice of the Anti-Abortion Movement : The Rise of "Pro-Woman" Rhetoric in Canada and the United States. 妊娠中絶反対運動の変化する声

・ISBN 978-1-4426-4761-9 cloth US$ 103.00

¥24,132.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-1-4426-1569-4 paper US$ 51.00

¥11,949.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Saurette, Paul / Gordon, K.,
出版社(U. Toronto Pr., CN)
出版年月2015
ページ数448 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<626-2625 626-L1686>

解説

When journalists, academics, and politicians describe the North American anti-abortion movement, they often describe a campaign that is male-dominated, aggressive, and even violent in its tactics, religious in motivation, anti-women in tone, and fetal-centric in arguments and rhetoric. Are they correct? In The Changing Voice of the Anti-Abortion Movement, Paul Saurette and Kelly Gordon suggest that the reality is far more complicated, particularly in Canada. Today, anti-abortion activism increasingly presents itself as "pro-women": using female spokespersons, adopting medical and scientific language to claim that abortion harms women, and employing a wide range of more subtle framing and narrative rhetorical tactics that use traditionally progressive themes to present the anti-abortion position as more feminist than pro-choice feminism. Following a succinct but comprehensive overview of the two-hundred year history of North American debate and legislation on abortion, Saurette and Gordon present the results of their systematic, five-year quantitative and qualitative discourse analysis, supplemented by extensive first-person observations, and outline the implications that flow from these findings. Their discoveries are a challenge to our current assumptions about the abortion debate today, and their conclusions will be compelling for both scholars and activists alike.