株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Roe v. Dobbs : The Past, Present, and Future of a Constitutional Right to Abortion.
商品詳細
Roe v. Dobbs : The Past, Present, and Future of a Constitutional Right to Abortion. G.R.ストーン他編 Roe対Dobbs-憲法上の中絶する権利の過去、現在、未来
・ISBN 978-0-19-776035-2 hard US$ 99.00
¥23,195.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
・ISBN 978-0-19-776036-9 paper US$ 29.99
¥7,025.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-776039-0
| 著者・編者 | Bollinger, Lee C. / Stone, Geoffrey R. (eds.), |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Oxford U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2024 |
| ページ数 | 498 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <711-1293 711-585> |
解説
With this volume, Roe v. Dobbs: The Past, Present and Future of a Constitutional Right of Abortion, we confront the remarkable beginning and end--once again, after a half-century-of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, shockingly overruled by the Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The goal of this book is to bring together some of our nation's leading constitutional scholars, historians, philosophers, and medical experts to share their views on whether there should be a constitutional right to abortion and what the consequences of Dobbs might be. What makes this subject unique is how it intersects with our own lives, since both Bollinger and Stone were law clerks at the Supreme Court in the year that Roe was decided (1973)--Stone for Justice William Brennan and Bollinger for Chief Justice Warren Burger. During the Court's 1972 Term, when Roe was decided, the Court was in a state of flux. President Nixon had just appointed four Justices to the Court--Burger, Blackmun, Powell, and Rehnquist. The era of the Warren Court was clearly over. In those days, the Justices were non-partisan, often joined opinions across the political/ideological spectrum, and approached cases with an open mind. That in large part explains why the Court could reach the decision it did in Roe, with five of the six Republican-appointed Justices and two of the three Democratic-appointed Justices in the majority, and one Republican-appointed justice (Rehnquist) and one Democratic-appointed justice (White) in dissent. It was a different Court and a different era.