株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧In Defense of Openness: Why Global Freedom Is the Humane Solution to Global Poverty.

商品詳細

In Defense of Openness: Why Global Freedom Is the Humane Solution to Global Poverty.

In Defense of Openness: Why Global Freedom Is the Humane Solution to Global Poverty. グローバルな自由がグローバルな貧困への人道的な解決である理由

・ISBN 978-0-19-046295-6 hard US$ 100.00

¥23,430.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-046297-0

著者・編者van der Vossen, Bas / Brennan, J.,
出版社(Oxford U. Pr., US)
出版年月2018
ページ数240 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<T50-1409 646-1711>

解説

The topic of global justice has long been a central concern within political philosophy and political theory, and there is no doubt that it will remain significant given the persistence of poverty on a massive scale and soaring global inequality. Yet, virtually every analysis in the vast literature of the subject seems ignorant of what developmental economists, both left and right, have to say about the issue. In Defense of Openness illuminates the problem by stressing that that there is overwhelming evidence that economic rights and freedom are necessary for development, and that global redistribution tends to hurt more than it helps. Bas van der Vossen and Jason Brennan instead ask what a theory of global justice would look like if it were informed by the facts that mainstream development and institutional economics have brought to light. They conceptualize global justice as global freedom and insist we can help the poor-and help ourselves at the same time-by implementing open borders, free trade, the strong protection of individual freedom, and economic rights and property for all around the world. In short, they work from empirical, consequentialist grounds to advocate for the market society as a model for global justice. A spirited challenge to mainstream political theory from two leading political philosophers, In Defense of Openness offers a new approach to global justice: We don't need to "save" the poor. The poor will save themselves, if we would only get out of their way and let them.