株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia.
商品詳細
Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia.
・ISBN 978-0-8265-1616-9 paper US$ 39.95
¥9,359.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Cummings, Robert E., |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Vanderbilt University Press, US) |
| 出版年月 | 2009 |
| ページ数 | 216 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <A01-51789> |
解説
Focusing largely on the controversial website Wikipedia, the author explores the challenges confronting teachers of college writing in the increasingly electronic and networked writing environments that their students use every day. Rather than praising or condemning that site for its role as an encyclopedia, Cummings instead sees it as a site for online collaboration between writers and a way to garner audience for student writing.Applying an understanding of Commons-Based Peer Production theory, as developed by Yochai Benkler, this text is arranged around five key propositions: Commons-Based Peer Production is a novel economic phenomenon which informs our current teaching model and describes a method for making sense of future electronic developments; college writers are motivated to do their best work when they write for an authentic audience, external to the class; writing for a networked knowledge community invites students to participate in making knowledge, rather than only consuming it; a plan for integrating networked writing for an external audience helps students understand the transition from high school to college writing; and, allowing students to review and self-select points of entry into electronic discourse fosters 'laziness,' or a new work dynamic where writers seek to better understand their own creativity in terms of a project's demands. ""Lazy Virtues"" offers networked writing assignments to foster development of student writers by exposing them to the demands of professional audiences, asking them to identify and assess their own creative impulses in terms of a project's needs, and removing the writing teacher from the role of sole audience.