株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making.
商品詳細
Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making.
・ISBN 978-0-7391-4251-6 hard US$ 136.00
¥31,864.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Podliska, Bradley F., |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | (Innovations in the Study of World Politics) |
| 出版社 | (Lexington Books, US) |
| 出版年月 | 2010 |
| ページ数 | 272 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <A00-68381> |
解説
Acting Alone: A Scientific Study of American Hegemony and Unilateral Use-of-Force Decision Making is a straight-forward analysis of unilateral U.S. military actions, which are dependent upon the power disparity between the U.S. and the rest of the world. In solving the puzzle as to why individual presidents have made the 'wrong' decision to act alone, the author lays out a president's behavior, during a crisis, as a two-step decision process. Acting Alone reviews the well-studied first decision, deciding to use force, based on international conflict literature and organized along traditional lines. The author then details the second decision, deciding to use unilateral force, with an explanation of the criticisms of multilateralism and the reasons for unilateralism. To test a new theory of unilateral use of force decision making, Acting Alone devises a definition and coding rules for unilateral use of force, develops a sequential model of presidential use of force decision making, and constructs a new, alternative measure of military power, a Composite Indicator of Military Revolutions (CIMR). It then uses three methods - a statistical test with a heckman probit model, an experiment, and case studies - to test U.S. crisis behavior since 1937. By applying these three methods, the author finds that presidents are realists and make expected utility calculations to act unilaterally or multilaterally after their decision to use force. The unilateral decision, in particular, positively correlates with a wide military gap with an opponent, an opponent located in the Western hemisphere, and a national security threat.