株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Cauca's Indigenous Movement in Southwestern Colombia : Land, Violence, and Ethnic Identity.
商品詳細
Cauca's Indigenous Movement in Southwestern Colombia : Land, Violence, and Ethnic Identity. コロンビア南西部におけるカウカの先住民運動 -土地、暴力、エスニック・アイデンティティ-
・ISBN 978-1-4985-0228-3 cloth GB£ 95.00
¥30,096.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Troyan, Brett, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | The Peoples of "Latin" America and the Caribbean |
| 出版社 | (Lexington Books, US) |
| 出版年月 | 2015 |
| ページ数 | 232 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <626-2278> |
解説
Cauca's Indigenous Movement in Southwestern Colombia: Land, Violence, and Ethnic Identity provides a vivid account of how the indigenous communities of Cauca in southwestern Colombia engaged with the Colombian central state. Troyan begins with the question of how 3.4 percent of the Colombian population obtained legal rights to close to a quarter of the national territory. Her in-depth study of the correspondence between the central state and indigenous communities of Cauca reveals that the nation state played a key role in the legitimization of land claims based on ethnic identity. Starting with the indigenous movement led by Manuel Quintin Lame in 1914, this book shows how, in contrast to the local authorities of Cauca, the central state adopted a more sympathetic albeit contradictory approach to indigenous communities' grievances throughout the twentieth century. Land, Violence, and Cauca's Indigenous Movement in Southwestern Colombia presents an examination of state initiatives in the 1930s, 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s toward indigenous communities in Cauca, whichsheds light on the political and social construction of Colombian indigenous identity. Troyan also reveals how violence and the representation of violence shaped the conversations between the central state and indigenous communities of Cauca; the central state's inability to exert a monopoly on violence, Troyan argues, places indigenous communities and their leaders in jeopardy despite the discursive legitimization of land claims based on ethnic identity.