株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Critical Security Studies in the Digital Age : Social Media and Security.
商品詳細
Critical Security Studies in the Digital Age : Social Media and Security. デジタル時代の批判的安全保障研究-ソーシャルメディアと安全保障
・ISBN 978-3-031-20733-4 hard EUR 129.99
¥34,745.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Downing, Joseph, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | New Security Challenges |
| 出版社 | (Palgrave Macmillan, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2023.01 |
| ページ数 | 265 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <695-1003 695-1135> |
解説
This book demonstrates that the disciplinary boundaries present within international relations approaches to security studies are redundant when examining social media, and inter- and multi-disciplinary analysis is key. A key result of the analysis undertaken is that when examining the social media sphere security scholars need to "expect the unexpected". This is because social media enables users to subvert, contest and create security narratives with symbols and idioms of their choice which can take into account "traditional" security themes, but also unexpected and under explored themes such as narratives from the local context of the users' towns and cities, and the symbolism of football clubs. The book also explores the complex topography of social media when considering constructions of security. The highly dynamic topography of social media is neither elite dominated and hierarchical as the Copenhagen School conceptualises security speak. However, neither is it completely flat and egalitarian as suggested by the vernacular security studies' non-elite approach. Rather, social media's topography is shifting and dynamic, with individuals gaining influence in security debates in unpredictable ways. In examining social media this book engages with the emancipatory burden of critical security studies. This book argues that it remains unfulfilled on social media and rather presents a "thin" notion of discursive emancipation where social media does provide the ability for previously excluded voices to participate in security debates, even if this does not result in their direct emancipation from power hierarchies and structures offline.