株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said : The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision. Rev. ed.
商品詳細
What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said : The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision. Rev. ed. ロウ対ウェイド事件は何を言うべきだったか 改訂版
・ISBN 978-1-4798-2448-9 hard US$ 89.00
￥20,852.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-1-4798-2310-9 paper US$ 23.95
￥5,611.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック（eBook）ISBN 978-1-4798-2446-5
| 著者・編者 | Balkin, Jack M. (ed.), |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (New York U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2023.01 |
| ページ数 | 344 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜694-460 694-486＞ |
解説
A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion
In January 1973, the Supreme Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court's 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court's legitimacy.
Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years' experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation-and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it-and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath.