株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Actual Malice : Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. Sullivan.
商品詳細
Actual Malice : Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. Sullivan. ニューヨーク・タイムズ対サリバンにおける市民権と報道の自由
・ISBN 978-0-520-38582-5 hard US$ 29.95
￥7,016.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Barbas, Samantha, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (U. California Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2023.02 |
| ページ数 | 290 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜692-296 692-313＞ |
解説
"A detailed examination of . . . the landmark 1964 Supreme Court decision that defined libel laws and increased protections for journalists."-The New York Times Book Review
"A heroic narrative."-The New Yorker
A deeply researched legal drama that documents this landmark First Amendment ruling-one that is more critical and controversial than ever.
Actual Malice tells the full story of New York Times v. Sullivan, the dramatic case that grew out of segregationists' attempts to quash reporting on the civil rights movement. In its landmark 1964 decision, the Supreme Court held that a public official must prove "actual malice" or reckless disregard of the truth to win a libel lawsuit, providing critical protections for free speech and freedom of the press.
Drawing on previously unexplored sources, including the archives of the New York Times Company and civil rights leaders, Samantha Barbas tracks the saga behind one of the most important First Amendment rulings in history. She situates the case within the turbulent 1960s and the history of the press, alongside striking portraits of the lawyers, officials, judges, activists, editors, and journalists who brought and defended the case. As the Sullivan doctrine faces growing controversy, Actual Malice reminds us of the stakes of the case that shaped American reporting and public discourse as we know it.
"A heroic narrative."-The New Yorker
A deeply researched legal drama that documents this landmark First Amendment ruling-one that is more critical and controversial than ever.
Actual Malice tells the full story of New York Times v. Sullivan, the dramatic case that grew out of segregationists' attempts to quash reporting on the civil rights movement. In its landmark 1964 decision, the Supreme Court held that a public official must prove "actual malice" or reckless disregard of the truth to win a libel lawsuit, providing critical protections for free speech and freedom of the press.
Drawing on previously unexplored sources, including the archives of the New York Times Company and civil rights leaders, Samantha Barbas tracks the saga behind one of the most important First Amendment rulings in history. She situates the case within the turbulent 1960s and the history of the press, alongside striking portraits of the lawyers, officials, judges, activists, editors, and journalists who brought and defended the case. As the Sullivan doctrine faces growing controversy, Actual Malice reminds us of the stakes of the case that shaped American reporting and public discourse as we know it.