株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ The Interpretation and Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Investment Arbitration.
商品詳細
The Interpretation and Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Investment Arbitration. 投資仲裁における最恵国条項の解釈と応用
【Open Accessタイトル】
・ISBN 978-90-04-51788-2 hard EUR 143.00
￥38,223.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Wang, Anqi, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | World Trade Institute Advanced Studies |
| 出版社 | (Brill / Nijhoff, NE) |
| 出版年月 | 2022.09 |
| ページ数 | 316 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜688-666 688-691＞ |
解説
The open access publication of this book has been published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
In The Interpretation and Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Investment Arbitration, Dr. Anqi Wang provides suggestions for MFN drafting in future international investment agreements (IIAs), as well as for MFN application by investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals in case of ambiguity. Dr. Wang conducts a systemic review of MFN clause in history and maps all the relevant ISDS cases. She argues that ISDS tribunals should interpret the MFN clause according to the treaty text on a case-by-case basis, and that tribunals should also consider state consent as the foundation for the jurisdiction of international adjudication, current IIA reform, and essential treaty interpretive principles.
In The Interpretation and Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Investment Arbitration, Dr. Anqi Wang provides suggestions for MFN drafting in future international investment agreements (IIAs), as well as for MFN application by investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals in case of ambiguity. Dr. Wang conducts a systemic review of MFN clause in history and maps all the relevant ISDS cases. She argues that ISDS tribunals should interpret the MFN clause according to the treaty text on a case-by-case basis, and that tribunals should also consider state consent as the foundation for the jurisdiction of international adjudication, current IIA reform, and essential treaty interpretive principles.