株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Building Bridges between Chan Buddhism and Confucianism : A Comparative Hermeneutics of Qisong's "Essays on Assisting the Teaching".
商品詳細
Building Bridges between Chan Buddhism and Confucianism : A Comparative Hermeneutics of Qisong's "Essays on Assisting the Teaching".
・ISBN 978-0-253-06367-0 hard US$ 90.00
¥21,087.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-0-253-06368-7 paper US$ 45.00
¥10,543.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Arghirescu, Diana, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | World Philosophies |
| 出版社 | (Indiana U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2022.12 |
| ページ数 | 308 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <684-149> |
解説
In Building Bridges between Chan Buddhism and Confucianism, Diana Arghirescu explores the close connections between Buddhism and Confucianism during China's Song period (960-1279). Drawing on In Essays on Assisting the Teaching written by Chan monk-scholar Qisong (1007-1072), Arghirescu examines the influences between the two traditions. In his writings, Qisong made the first substantial efforts to compare the major dimensions of Confucian and Chan Buddhist thought from a philosophical view, seeking to establish a meaningful and influential intellectual and ethical bridge between them.
Arghirescu meticulously reveals a "Confucianized" dimension of Qisong's thought, showing how he revisited and reinterpreted Confucian terminology in his special form of Chan aimed at his contemporary Confucian readers and auditors "who do not know Buddhism." Qisong's form of eleventh-century Chan, she argues, is unique in its cohesive or nondual perspective on Chinese Buddhist, Confucian, and other philosophical traditions, which considers all of them to be interdependent and to share a common root.
Building Bridges between Chan Buddhism and Confucianism is the first book to identify, examine, and expand on a series of Confucian concepts and virtues that were specifically identified and discussed from a Buddhist perspective by a historical Buddhist writer. It represents a major contribution in the comparative understanding of both traditions.