株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Chasing Freedom : The Philippines' Long Journey to Democratic Ambivalence.

商品詳細

Chasing Freedom

Chasing Freedom : The Philippines' Long Journey to Democratic Ambivalence.

・ISBN 978-1-78976-043-9 hard GB£ 110.00

¥34,848.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Webb, Adele,
シリーズThe Sussex Library of Asian & Asian American Studies
出版社(Sussex Academic Pr., UK)
出版年月2022
ページ数240 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<679-915>

解説

How did Rodrigo Duterte earn the support of large segments of the Philippine middle class, despite imposing arbitrary rule and offering little tolerance for dissent? Has the Filipino middle class, heroes of the 1986 People Power Revolution, given up on democracy?

Chasing Freedom tells the story of the love/hate relationship of the Philippine middle class with democratic politics. It illuminates the historical roots and contingency of the Philippine middle-class's reticence about democracy, and makes visible the forms of power that have shaped and constrained middle-class imaginings of democracy and representations of themselves as political subjects. Drawing on historical archival work, discourse analysis and fieldwork interviews, the chapters trace the attitudes of the Filipino middle class from the time of American colonization in 1898 to the 2016 election of strongman Rodrigo Duterte. The argument is that democracy has been, and continues to be, lived in a deeply ambivalent way. The simultaneous saying of 'yes' and 'no' to democracy by citizens is one of the defining features of the Philippines' democratic journey. The prime source of this ambivalence, the book argues, is the Janus face of America's 'democratic imperialism', and the deprecation inherent in the project of 'democratic tutelage'.

According to Webb, the Philippines is a bellwether case of what she calls democratic ambivalence. In an age when disenchantment with democracy is on the rise, it provides lessons of global importance. The book's empirical findings support a striking conclusion: since ambivalence is not simply a 'pathology' of democracy, but one of its persistent features, the dynamics of ambivalence need to be at the heart of descriptive and normative accounts of how democracy works.