株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ The Truman Court : Law and the Limits of Loyalty.
商品詳細
The Truman Court : Law and the Limits of Loyalty.
・ISBN 978-0-8262-2229-9 hard US$ 38.95
￥9,125.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | James, Rawn, Jr., |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (U. Missouri Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2021 |
| ページ数 | 316 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜663-L3696 663-P5635＞ |
解説
Perhaps the most overlooked aspect of Harry S. Truman's presidency is his judicial legacy, with even the finest of Truman biographies neglecting to consider the influence he had on the Supreme Court. Yet, as Rawn James lays out in engaging detail, as president Harry Truman successfully molded the high court into a judicial body that appeared to actively support his administration's political agenda. In rulings that sparked controversy in their own time, the Supreme Court repeatedly upheld Truman's most contentious policies, including actions to restrict free speech, expand civil rights, and manage labor union unrest.
The Truman Court: Law and the Limits of Loyalty argues that the years between FDR's death in 1945 and Chief Justice Earl Warren's confirmation in 1953-the dawn of the Cold War-were, contrary to widespread belief, important years in Supreme Court history. Never before or since has a president so quickly and completely changed the ideological and temperamental composition of the Court. With remarkable swiftness and certainty, Truman constructed a Court on which he relied to lend constitutional credence to his political agenda.
The Truman Court: Law and the Limits of Loyalty argues that the years between FDR's death in 1945 and Chief Justice Earl Warren's confirmation in 1953-the dawn of the Cold War-were, contrary to widespread belief, important years in Supreme Court history. Never before or since has a president so quickly and completely changed the ideological and temperamental composition of the Court. With remarkable swiftness and certainty, Truman constructed a Court on which he relied to lend constitutional credence to his political agenda.