株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Democracy and Executive Power : Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France.
商品詳細
Democracy and Executive Power : Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France.
・ISBN 978-0-300-25495-2 hard US$ 65.00
￥15,229.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Rose-Ackerman, Susan, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Yale U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2022.01 |
| ページ数 | 424 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜663-L1919 663-P3023＞ |
解説
A defense of regulatory agencies' efforts to combine public consultation with bureaucratic expertise to serve the interest of all citizens
"This exceptional exploration of how four advanced democracies pursue legitimacy in the bureaucratic implementation of regulatory law makes an invaluable contribution."-Peter M. Shane, author of Madison's Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy
The statutory delegation of rule-making authority to the executive has recently become a source of controversy. There are guiding models, but none, Susan Rose-Ackerman claims, is a good fit with the needs of regulating in the public interest. Using a cross-national comparison of public policy-making in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, she argues that public participation inside executive rule-making processes is necessary to preserve the legitimacy of regulatory policy-making.
"This exceptional exploration of how four advanced democracies pursue legitimacy in the bureaucratic implementation of regulatory law makes an invaluable contribution."-Peter M. Shane, author of Madison's Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy
The statutory delegation of rule-making authority to the executive has recently become a source of controversy. There are guiding models, but none, Susan Rose-Ackerman claims, is a good fit with the needs of regulating in the public interest. Using a cross-national comparison of public policy-making in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, she argues that public participation inside executive rule-making processes is necessary to preserve the legitimacy of regulatory policy-making.