株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Global Regulatory Standards in Environmental and Health Disputes : Regulatory Coherence, Due Regard, and Due Diligence.

商品詳細

Global Regulatory Standards in Environmental and Health Disputes

Global Regulatory Standards in Environmental and Health Disputes : Regulatory Coherence, Due Regard, and Due Diligence. 環境・健康論争におけるグローバルな規制の基準

・ISBN 978-0-19-881055-1 hard GB£ 120.00

¥38,016.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-184782-0

著者・編者Foster, Caroline E.,
出版社(Oxford U. Pr., UK)
出版年月2021.06
ページ数416 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<662-1017 662-L1930>

解説

Global regulatory standards are emerging from the environmental and health jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, the World Trade Organization, under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and investor-state dispute settlement. Most prominent are the three standards of regulatory coherence, due regard for the rights of others, and due diligence in the prevention of harm. These global regulatory standards are a phenomenon of our times, representing a new contribution to the ordering of the relationship between domestic and international law, and a revised conception of sovereignty in an increasingly pluralistic global legal era. However, the legitimacy of the resulting 'standards-enriched' international law remains open to question. International courts and tribunals should not be the only fora in which these standards are elaborated, and many challenges and opportunities lie ahead in the ongoing development of global regulatory standards. Debate over whether regulatory coherence should go beyond reasonableness and rationality requirements and require proportionality stricto sensu in the relationship between regulatory measures and their objectives is central. Due regard, the most novel of the emerging standards, may help protect international law's legitimacy claims in the interim. Meanwhile, all actors should attend to the integration rather than the fragmentation of international law, and to changes in the status of private actors.