株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Age of Promises : Electoral Pledges in Twentieth Century Britain.
商品詳細
Age of Promises : Electoral Pledges in Twentieth Century Britain. 20世紀英国における選挙公約
・ISBN 978-0-19-884303-0 hard GB£ 99.00
¥31,363.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-187893-0
| 著者・編者 | Thackeray, David / Toye, Richard, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Oxford U. Pr., UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2021.03 |
| ページ数 | 256 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <660-P6929 661-2413> |
解説
Age of Promises explores the issue of electoral promises in twentieth century Britain - how they were made, how they were understood, and how they evolved across time - through a study of general election manifestos and election addresses. The authors argue that a history of the act of making promises - which is central to the political process, but which has not been sufficiently analysed - illuminates the development of political communication and democratic representation. The twentieth century saw a broad shift away from politics viewed as a discursive process whereby, at elections, it was enough to set out broad principles, with detailed policymaking to follow once in office following reflection and discussion. Over the first part of the century parties increasingly felt required to compile lists of specific policies to offer to voters, which they were then considered to have an obligation to carry out come what may. From 1945 onwards, moreover, there was even more focus on detailed, costed, pledges. We live in an age of growing uncertainty over the authority and status of political promises. In the wake of the 2016 EU referendum controversy erupted over parliamentary sovereignty. Should 'the will of the people' as manifested in the referendum result be supreme, or did MPs owe a primary responsibility to their constituents and/or to the party manifestos on which they had been elected? Age of Promises demonstrates that these debates build on a long history of differing understandings about what status of manifestos and addresses should have in shaping the actions of government.