株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Euthanasia and the Ethics of a Doctor's Decisions : An Argument Against Assisted Dying.
商品詳細
Euthanasia and the Ethics of a Doctor's Decisions : An Argument Against Assisted Dying. 安楽死と医師の決定の倫理
・ISBN 978-1-350-18621-7 hard GB£ 80.00
¥25,344.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-1-350-18622-4 paper GB£ 23.99
¥7,599.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-350-18625-5
| 著者・編者 | Hartling, Ole, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Bloomsbury Academic, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2021.04 |
| ページ数 | 224 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <660-P2397 660-P475> |
解説
Why do so many doctors have profound misgivings about the push to legalise euthanasia and assisted suicide? Ole Hartling uses his background as a physician, university professor and former chairman of the Danish Council of Ethics to introduce new elements into what can often be understood as an all too simple debate.
Alive to the case that assisted dying can be driven by an unattainable yearning for control, Hartling concentrates on two fundamental questions: whether the answer to suffering is to remove the sufferer, and whether self-determination in dying and death is an illusion.
He draws on his own experience as a medical doctor to personalize the ethical arguments, share patients' narratives and make references to medical literature. Here is a sceptical stance towards euthanasia, one that is respectful to those who hold different opinions and well-informed about the details and nuances of different euthanasia practices.
Written from a Scandinavian perspective, where respect for autonomy and high quality palliative care go hand in hand, Hartling's is a nuanced, valuable contribution to the arguments that surround a question doctors have faced since the birth of medicine. He shows us how the intentions of doing something good can sometimes lead to even greater dilemmas, opening us up to those situations where an inclination to end suffering by ending life is deeply conflicting both for the clinician and for any fellow human being.