株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said : The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision.
商品詳細
What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said : The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision. Obergefell v. Hodges事件は 何を言うべきだったか
・ISBN 978-0-300-22155-8 paper US$ 37.50
￥8,785.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
| 著者・編者 | Balkin, Jack M. (ed.), |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (Yale U. Pr., US) |
| 出版年月 | 2021.01 |
| ページ数 | 400 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜660-1026 660-L2540＞ |
解説
Rewriting the Supreme Court's landmark gay rights decision
Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and debate what Obergefell should mean for the future.
In addition to serving as Chief Justice of this imaginary court, Balkin provides a critical introduction to the case. He recounts the story of the gay rights litigation that led to Obergefell, and he explains how courts respond to political mobilizations for new rights claims. The social movement for gay rights and marriage equality is a powerful example of how-through legal imagination and political struggle-arguments once dismissed as "off-the-wall" can later become established in American constitutional law.
Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and debate what Obergefell should mean for the future.
In addition to serving as Chief Justice of this imaginary court, Balkin provides a critical introduction to the case. He recounts the story of the gay rights litigation that led to Obergefell, and he explains how courts respond to political mobilizations for new rights claims. The social movement for gay rights and marriage equality is a powerful example of how-through legal imagination and political struggle-arguments once dismissed as "off-the-wall" can later become established in American constitutional law.