株式会社極東書店トップ ＞ 商品一覧 ＞ Coercive Human Rights : Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR.
商品詳細
Coercive Human Rights : Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR. 強制的人権 －欧州人権条約下の刑法の動員の積極的義務－
・ISBN 978-1-5099-3787-5 hard GB£ 95.00
￥30,096.- (税込) ※（※）価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック（eBook）ISBN 978-1-5099-3790-5
| 著者・編者 | Lavrysen, Laurens / Mavronicola, Natasa (eds.), |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Hart Studies in Security and Justice |
| 出版社 | (Hart, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2020.11 |
| ページ数 | 328 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | ＜660-925 660-L1342＞ |
解説
Traditionally, human rights have protected those facing the sharp edge of the criminal justice system. But over time human rights law has become increasingly infused with duties to mobilise criminal law towards protection and redress for violation of rights. These developments give rise to a whole host of questions concerning the precise parameters of coercive human rights, the rationale(s) that underpin them, and their effects and implications for victims, perpetrators, domestic legal systems, and for the theory and practice of human rights and criminal justice. This collection addresses these questions with a focus on the rich jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).
The collection explores four interlocking themes surrounding the issue of coercive human rights:
First, the key threads in the doctrine of the ECtHR on duties to mobilise the criminal law as a means of delivering human rights protection.
Secondly, the factors that contribute to a readiness to demand coercive measures, including discrimination and vulnerability, and other key justificatory reasoning shaping the development of coercive human rights.
Thirdly, the most pressing challenges for the ECtHR's coercive duties doctrine, including:
- how it relates to theories and rationales of criminalisation and criminal punishment;
- its implications for the fundamental tenets of human rights law itself;
- its relationship to transitional justice objectives; and
- how (far) it coheres with the imperative of effective protection for persons in precarious or vulnerable situations.
Fourthly, the (prospective) evolution of the coercive human rights doctrine and its application within national jurisdictions.