株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧An Inquiry into the Nature of Aesthetic Theory in its Relation to Theory of Knowledge in Kant's Critical Philosophy.

商品詳細

An Inquiry into the Nature of Aesthetic Theory in its Relation to Theory of Knowledge in Kant's Critical Philosophy.

An Inquiry into the Nature of Aesthetic Theory in its Relation to Theory of Knowledge in Kant's Critical Philosophy.

・ISBN 978-3-631-81751-3 paper SFR 77.00

¥22,191.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り
著者・編者Özdoyran, Güven,
出版社(P. Lang, SZ)
出版年月2020
ページ数240 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<659-L156 659-P248>

解説

The primary objective of An Inquiry into the Nature of Aesthetic Theory in Its Relation to Theory of Knowledge in Kant’s Critical Philosophy is to investigate Kant’s aesthetic theory and its problematic relation to theory of knowledge in his transcendental philosophy. In the Critique of Judgment, Kant constructs his aesthetic theory by arguing that the aesthetic experience is based on a certain type of feeling, namely, the feeling of pleasure, rather than a concept. He grounds such a feeling on the aesthetic judgment of reflection. In spite of its nonconceptual and subjective characteristic, an aesthetic reflective judgment still has a claim to be universally valid. Here, the feeling of pleasure in beautiful is produced by the free harmonious relation between the imagination and the understanding. Judgment, in its reflective employment, does not determine its object but determines the feeling of pleasure in the judging subject. On the other hand, the categories, as pure concepts of the understanding, carry nearly all the weight in his theory of knowledge presented in the Critique of Pure Reason. The imagination, in this case, is strictly bound up by the rules that are imposed by the concepts of the understanding. By this way, judgment, as a cognitive faculty, determines its object and gains its objective validity. In this context, this book discusses the nature of Kant’s aesthetic theory and the components that constitute a pure aesthetic judgment of reflection and attempts to clarify its proper place in critical philosophy regarding his theory of knowledge.