株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Failure or Reform? : Market-Based Policy Instruments for Sustainable Agriculture and Resource Management.

商品詳細

Failure or Reform?

Failure or Reform? : Market-Based Policy Instruments for Sustainable Agriculture and Resource Management. 持続可能な農業と資源管理のための 市場ベースの政策手段

・ISBN 978-1-138-22338-7 hard GB£ 171.99

¥54,486.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

・ISBN 978-1-138-22339-4 paper GB£ 43.99

¥13,935.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-315-40494-3

著者・編者Lockie, Stewart,
出版社(Routledge, UK)
出版年月2020
ページ数154 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<651-2373 651-562>

解説

Market reform promises more environmental protection and more profitable agriculture at lower financial cost. Too good to be true? This book examines numerous empirical examples of policy in action to identify principles for the successful application of market-based policy instruments.

Where some market instruments are used to fix market failures by putting a value on environmental protection, others use market-like mechanisms to allocate financial incentives for environmental work. They are promoted as flexible, efficient and politically neutral solutions to the competing demands of social, economic and ecological sustainability. But they also attract criticism for rolling back environmental regulation and privatizing public goods. This book argues that while many market-based instruments have merit, decisions about responsibility cannot be left entirely to the market. Whichever instruments we use, decision-making needs to be embedded in a logic of democratization.

Using case studies from around the world, this book investigates how instruments like eco-standards, payments for ecosystem services, pollution trading and community-based natural resource management perform in practice, and what can be learned about applying them more effectively. While the approach is primarily sociological, it is deliberately written to bridge the gap between sociology, economics, environmental sciences and the concerns of environmental policy makers.