株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Augustine's Early Thought on the Redemptive Function of Divine Judgement.
商品詳細
Augustine's Early Thought on the Redemptive Function of Divine Judgement. 神の裁きの贖罪の機能に関する アウグスティヌスの初期の思想
・ISBN 978-0-19-883492-2 hard GB£ 115.00
¥36,432.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-19-187280-8
| 著者・編者 | van Egmond, Bart, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Oxford Early Christian Studies |
| 出版社 | (Oxford U. Pr., UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2018 |
| ページ数 | 304 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <647-324 647-P737> |
解説
Augustine's Early Thought on the Redemptive Function of Divine Judgement considers the relationship between Augustine's account of God's judgment and his theology of grace in his early works. How does God use his law and the penal consequences of its transgression in the service of his grace, both personally and through his 'agents' on earth? Augustine reflected on this question from different perspectives. As a teacher and bishop, he thought about the nature of discipline and punishment in the education of his pupils, brothers, and congregants. As a polemicist against the Manichaeans and as a biblical expositor, he had to grapple with issues regarding God's relationship to evil in the world, the violence God displays in the Old Testament, and in the death of his own Son. Furthermore, Augustine meditated on the way God's judgment and grace related in his own life, both before and after his conversion. Bart van Egmond follows the development of Augustine's early thought on judgment and grace from the Cassiacum writings to the Confessions. The argument is contextualized both against the background of the earlier Christian tradition of reflection on the providential function of divine chastisement, and the tradition of psychagogy that Augustine inherited from a variety of rhetorical and philosophical sources. This study expertly contributes to the ongoing scholarly discussion on the development of Augustine's doctrine of grace, and to the conversation on the theological roots of his justification of coercion against the Donatists.