株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > One America?: Presidential Appeals to Racial Resentment from LBJ to Trump.
商品詳細
One America?: Presidential Appeals to Racial Resentment from LBJ to Trump. 一つのアメリカ?-LBJからトランプまでの 人種に関する不満への大統領の要請-
・ISBN 978-1-4384-7151-8 2018 cloth US$ 104.00
¥24,367.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
・ISBN 978-1-4384-7152-5 2020 paper US$ 38.95
¥9,125.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
| 著者・編者 | Angelo, Nathan, |
|---|---|
| 出版社 | (State U. New York Pr., US) |
| ページ数 | 288 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <647-2637 647-L1573> |
解説
Reveals how presidents deploy a rhetoric that attempts to attract many racial and ethnic groups, but ultimately directs itself to an archtypal white, Middle-American swing voter.
Despite major advancements in civil rights in the United States since the 1960s, racial inequality continues to persist in American society. While it may appear that presidents do not address the topic of race, it lurks in the background of presidential political speech across a range of issues, including welfare, crime, and American identity. Using a thorough approach that places textual analysis in a historical context, One America? asks what presidents say about race, how often they say it, and to whom they say it. Nathan Angelo demonstrates how presidents attempt to use rhetoric to compose a message that will resonate with the many groups that comprise the modern party system, but ultimately those alliances cause presidents to direct most of their speeches about race to an archetypical white, Middle-American swing voter, thereby restricting the issues and solutions that they discuss. While the American demographic profile is changing, rhetoric that links American identity with racially coded concepts and appeals to white voters' racial resentments has become ubiquitous. Angelo warns us about the possible repercussions of such tactics, noting that, while they may allow presidents to craft winning coalitions, their use continues to legitimate a system that ignores racial inequality.