株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > Forum (Non) Conveniens in England: Past, Present, and Future.
商品詳細
Forum (Non) Conveniens in England: Past, Present, and Future. イングランドにおける(不)便宜地裁判所
・ISBN 978-1-78225-640-3 hard GB£ 75.00
¥23,760.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-5099-2576-6
| 著者・編者 | Arzandeh, Ardavan, |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | Studies in Private International Law |
| 出版社 | (Hart, UK) |
| 出版年月 | 2018 |
| ページ数 | 160 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <647-1562 646-P3095> |
解説
The forum (non) conveniens doctrine provides the basis for the discretionary exercise of jurisdiction by English courts in private international law disputes. London's pre-eminence as a centre for international commercial litigation has led to its frequent deployment in proceedings where parties disagree over where a case should be heard. The doctrine's significance is not limited to England but extends to many Commonwealth jurisdictions which have embraced it. This is the first book-length study devoted entirely to examining the forum (non) conveniens doctrine's past, present, and future from the perspective of the law in England. By offering a meticulous and critical analysis of relevant historical and contemporary sources in England and elsewhere, it seeks to fill gaps in relevant knowledge of the English forum (non) conveniens doctrine, and challenge certain views concerning its operation that have come to be regarded as representing the orthodoxy. In this respect, the book attempts to refine our understanding of the doctrine's historical development, evaluate its application in the years following its formal recognition in England, and examine the case for revising it, given the changing nature of international commercial litigation in recent decades. The book's ultimate objective is to act as an authoritative and comprehensive reference point for those with an interest in the forum (non) conveniens doctrine, more specifically, and cross-border private litigation, more generally.