株式会社極東書店トップ > 商品一覧 > William James, Moral Philosophy, and the Ethical Life.
商品詳細
William James, Moral Philosophy, and the Ethical Life. W.ジェームズ、道徳哲学、倫理的生活
・ISBN 978-1-4985-0514-7 2018 cloth GB£ 113.00
¥35,798.- (税込) ※(※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍のご注文が完了した時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。
お気に入り
★★★
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-0-7391-9014-2
電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-9787-4002-0
| 著者・編者 | Goodson, Jacob L. (ed.), |
|---|---|
| シリーズ | American Philosophy |
| 出版社 | (Lexington Books, US) |
| ページ数 | 442 pp. |
| 言語 | ENG |
| ニュース番号 | <644-280 644-L141> |
解説
Virtue theory, natural law, deontology, utilitarianism, existentialism: these are the basic moral theories taught in "Ethics," "History of Philosophy," and "Introduction to Philosophy" courses throughout the United States. When the American philosopher William James (1842 - 1910) find his way into these conversations, there is uncertainty about where his thinking fits. While utilitarianism has become the default position for teaching James's pragmatism and radical empiricism, this default position fails to address and explain James's multiple criticisms of John Stuart Mill's formulaic approach to questions concerning the moral life. Through close readings of James's writings, the chapters in William James, Moral Philosophy, and the Ethical Life catalogue the ways in whichJames wants to avoid the following: (a) the hierarchies of Christian natural law theory, (b) the moral calculus of Mill's utilitarianism, (c) the absolutism and principle-ism of Immanuel Kant's deontology, and (d) the staticity of the virtues found in Aristotle's moral theory. Elaborating upon and clarifying James's differences from these dominant moral theories is a crucial feature of this collection. This collection, is not, however, intended to be wholly negative - that is, only describing to readers what James's moral theory is not. It seeks to articulate the positive features of James's ethics and moral reasoning: what does it mean to an ethical life, and how should we theorize about morality?