株式会社極東書店トップ商品一覧Capitalism, Socialism and Property Rights: Why Market Socialism Cannot Substitute the Market.

商品詳細

Capitalism, Socialism and Property Rights: Why Market Socialism Cannot Substitute the Market.

Capitalism, Socialism and Property Rights: Why Market Socialism Cannot Substitute the Market. 資本主義、社会主義、財産権

・ISBN 978-1-78821-035-5 hard GB£ 85.00

¥26,928.- (税込) (※)価格はご注文時の参考価格となります。
納品価格につきましては書籍の入荷時点で確定となります。
版元の原価改定、外国為替の変動等により異なる場合がございますので、予めご了承下さい。

お気に入り

電子版あり 大学・学術機関向け電子ブック(eBook)ISBN 978-1-78821-036-2

著者・編者Machaj, Mateusz,
シリーズAustrian Economics
出版社(Agenda Pub., UK)
出版年月2018
ページ数224 pp.
言語ENG
ニュース番号<643-378 643-P794>

解説

The comparative analysis of socialist and capitalist economic systems has given rise to a voluminous literature in the history of economic thought, yet detailed analysis of the "market socialism" model, which seeks to imitate the functional efficiency of capitalism by simulating a competitive economy, has been relatively neglected. In this work, Mateusz Machaj seeks to redress this imbalance by providing an in-depth examination of one of the defining issues that separates capitalism from socialism - the system of ownership, or property rights - which, when explored, highlight fundamental problems in the market socialism model.

Taking a broadly Austrian perspective, he shows that the mechanism of efficiency in market socialism is unable to play the part ascribed to it by its theoreticians, because it disregards the fact that property rights are fundamental to the shaping of prices and thus the abolition of ownership in market socialism makes its mechanism of efficiency a fiction. Indeed, the author argues, the economic terms used in the model of market capitalism only mirror the names of the real economic variables that cause capitalism to be efficient, not their functions.

The books offers new and original insights into the theory of competition, theories of pricing, property laws, the relation between law and economics, as well as the economics of the market socialism model. It will be of interest to a wide range of heterodox economists.